Evidence One-Pager | BarPrepPlay
This Evidence one-pager is designed for fast retrieval: relevance, hearsay, character, impeachment, privileges, and experts in one compact review layer.
This Evidence one-pager is designed for fast retrieval: relevance, hearsay, character, impeachment, privileges, and experts in one compact review layer.
This Evidence one-pager is designed for fast retrieval: relevance, hearsay, character, impeachment, privileges, and experts in one compact review layer.
401: Any tendency to make fact more/less probable. 403: Exclude if prejudice substantially outweighs probative value. On the exam, treat this as a checklist heading: state the governing rule first, name the trigger or element that matters, and then tie the facts to each part before moving to the next doctrine.
Section sources
Out-of-court statement for truth. Exceptions: Present sense, excited utterance, state of mind, medical, business records, dying declaration. On the exam, treat this as a checklist heading: state the governing rule first, name the trigger or element that matters, and then tie the facts to each part before moving to the next doctrine.
Section sources
Civil: Generally no. Criminal: D opens door. 404(b): MIMIC purposes (motive, intent, mistake, identity, common plan). On the exam, treat this as a checklist heading: state the governing rule first, name the trigger or element that matters, and then tie the facts to each part before moving to the next doctrine.
Section sources
Prior conviction (dishonesty = auto; felony = 403), prior inconsistent, bias, sensory defect, character for truthfulness. On the exam, treat this as a checklist heading: state the governing rule first, name the trigger or element that matters, and then tie the facts to each part before moving to the next doctrine.
Section sources
A-C: Confidential legal advice. Spousal: Testimonial (who holds varies) + confidential communications. On the exam, treat this as a checklist heading: state the governing rule first, name the trigger or element that matters, and then tie the facts to each part before moving to the next doctrine.
Section sources
Daubert: Reliable methodology + sufficient facts. Can rely on inadmissible evidence if experts in field reasonably rely on it. On the exam, treat this as a checklist heading: state the governing rule first, name the trigger or element that matters, and then tie the facts to each part before moving to the next doctrine.
Section sources
Use it as a fast recall reset before you do active practice. It is designed to put the core frameworks back into working memory, not replace question practice.
Scan the one-pager first, then open the matching deep dive for full doctrine or the matching most-tested page for review priority. After that, move into a drill or mixed set.